Global Warming Conspiracy
Anthropogenic Global Warming is a lie.
To watch the whole movie above click here
UPDATE Nov 2009: A hacker or insider has revealed a number of confidential e-mails sent between climate experts. These have revealed a braod comspiracy to hide information, change it or delete it when it contradicts the human driven global warming position. The edifice is crumbling now that mainstream media outlets have run with the information.
You might quickly conclude that this is a one sided piece. You would be correct. Quite frankly if you do not already know the other side of the debate and it’s claims, you must live in a Himalayan cave and can’t be reading this!
We have lived in a time when so much rubbish has been revealed within that which passed as our education it seems almost no longer surprising to have been lied to. In various aspects we have been manipulated into going to war with ourselves on various levels and making big corporations cash in the process. Whether it is harmful industrial waste products such as Fluoride pumped into our water and being sold to us as a health product, or being asked to finance a war on our emotional state known as terror. Our food that was perfectly fine and healthy is now spliced with animal genetic material and infused with added chemical compounds.
So now we find a global government campaign, supported often by militant activists, to prevent Co2 increase. Co2 by the way is a core component of humans, as well as it of all biological material on our planet. It is considered as generally helpful or at least harmless by the majority of consulted scientists. Bear in mind that it transpired a very large number of the scientist listed by the IPCC as supporting man made climate change were never directly asked. Those who found their names on the list had to fight to remove them!
We are in the odd position of having declared war on fresh water, core material for our bodies, our mental states, and indeed the very food we eat. What the heck is going on folks?
Whilst the Co2 debate was relatively easy to defend during the 80s and 90s the situation changed after the millennium. It became clear in the first few years of 00s that the heating trend was levelling off. In fact when looking at the latest satellite data it is clear we are now seeing cooling. Recently very rapid cooling has been the trend.
It is woth looking at this pie-chart of how little Co2 we actually contribute.
For someone in my field of fringe subject investigation I tend to be monitoring things many other non-scientists ignore. I am always checking for global reports on weather events, geological upheavals and environmental anomalies. I also am always keenly monitoring solar activity.
It is amazing to see that whilst solar cycle 23 was heading into decline but still fairly active we had the very powerful storm season of 2005 (blamed on man made climate change) amidst rather hot air temperatures in the Gulf. Yet as cycle 23 truly wound down so did the heat.
In fact the sun itself seems to have revealed the fraud of man made climate change. Whilst the IPCC was counting on ever increasing solar activity (especially considering several very active cycles of late) to mask the fraud, the one thing they did not count on was the Sun suddenly going silent!
For those of you not aware the Sun is now two years overdue reaching minimum and is spotless. It is the quietest it has been for at least 100 years. Guess what happened from Jan 2007 to Jan 2008?
Only the single largest temperature drops year to year in the history of our recordings, so in at least 128 years. I thought Co2 went up again that year and that the IPCC model clearly said that every year we would see exponential heat increase matching the Co2 rise.
So why in early 2008 did the World Meteorological Organisation’s secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, tell the BBC average global temperatures have not risen since 1998?
He was of course quick to add that other experts have forecast a record high temperature within five years, and that 2008 would end up as a hot year. Actually 2008 saw temperatures globally at coolest since 2000, as well as Arctic Sea ice returning to the previous years levels!
An ever growing number of scientists now condemn the models used to support man-made climate change as no better than using old fashioned astrology to predict weather change. Worryingly many likely contributory factors were left out of the original models, arguably due to confusion over the variables, but often due to that fact grants went to people that supported the status quo. The multibillion-dollar Eco-industry that has ballooned from the IPCC conclusions is in no hurry for ‘good news’.
Of course the far leftwing Anti-Globalists also need the IPCC conclusion to remain fixed, it provides the best ammo they have at that moment. Both groups insist that poor Africans use incredibly expensive solar panels rather than burn their fossil fuels. This is tantamount to mass murder. We all know the Africans can’t afford solar panels or wind generators, they are not even affordable in most Western nations.
I am not out to convince anyone by sharing my observations and opinions, indeed I should say by reporting on the findings of other sceptics. I am not a climate science and therefore people must do their own research of the data. I must say though that my BS detector has gotten pretty good over the years. Even more so my sense of smell when it comes to weeding out Illuminati rat-think.
My main problem is that when I contrast my understanding of the world during 21 years of government education against it currently, I see that I was a mushroom all that time. My government deliberately kept me in the dark and fed me with shit. Virtually every major aspect of my world understanding transpired to be woefully out of touch with known modern scientific findings. Even holy cows such as the last ice age have been revealed as more complex and hazier than taught. The infamous missing data on the sudden melt is just the start. Ice process comprehension is especially interesting in light of the geologically anomalous Antarctic mountain range recently discovered.
Though I was suckered for several years by man-made climate change I was lucky in that my roving eye was monitoring the solar system. Climate change has been occurring on all of the planets in the solar system for several years now and is perhaps the clearest indicator that we never understood what was happening.
The real worry now should be that whilst mankind keeps on buying into what seems now a New World Order designed plan to halt progress, we risk being blind sided by a sudden catastrophic mini ice-age.
If the sun keeps quiet, Co2 keeps rising and the temperatures keep on dropping, judge the tree by its fruit.
For the moment the jury is out on all positions. There is certainly currently no more reason to beleive Co2 drives climate change than other factors.
Expert quotes:
* And my opinion is that there is absolutely no proof that carbon dioxide is anything to do with any impending catastrophe. The science has, quite simply, gone awry. In fact, it’s not even science any more, it’s anti-science. Professor David Bellamy* The suggestion that future hazardous climate events could in any way be mitigated by the control of carbon dioxide emissions is absurdity in the extreme. William Kininmonth, Emeritus head of Australia’s National Climate Centre
* Carbon dioxide is not even a little bit bad. It is wholly beneficial…There are no deleterious consequences of higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are wholly beneficial. Dr. David Archibald
* Compared to solar magnetic fields, however, the carbon dioxide production has as much influence on climate as a flea has on the weight of an elephant. Dr. Oliver K Manuel, University of Missouri
* The world has spent $50 billion on global warming since 1990, and we have not found any actual evidence that carbon emissions causes global warming. Dr. David Evans
* Carbon dioxide and the greenhouse gases are, by comparison [with the sun and the oceans], the equivalent of a few farts in a hurricane. Dr. Martin Hertzberg
* CO2 hysteria is the product of politicians, silly journalists and ignorant "green people".
It is very regrettably. Leonid Klyashtorin, Russian Scientist (2008 Letter to Dr. Walter Starck)
* You could go outside and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide. Reid Bryson PhD, a man who is still widely considered to be the father of scientific climatology in America.
* The hypothesis of current global warming resulting from the increased emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is a myth. Humans are not responsible for the increase in the global surface temperature of l degree F = O.56 degree centigrade during the last century and one should explain this increase by the natural forces heating the atmosphere…the anthropogenic impact on the global temperature is negligible. O.G.Sorokhtin, G.V. Chilinger and L.F. Khilyuk – all PhD’s and published authors in Earth Sciences
* Increase of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is not the cause of global warming which has a solar origin …There exists no reliable scientific evidence that anthropogenic increase of the carbon dioxide concentration has caused current global warming or can lead to catastrophic changes of the Earth climate in the visible future…anthropogenic global warming is a Great Myth. Habibullo I. Abdussamatov , Head of the Space Research Laboratory of the Russian Academies of Sciences' Pulkovo Observatory and of the International Space Station's Russian-Ukrainian Astrometria project
* William HapperI am convinced that the current alarm over carbon dioxide is mistaken. Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science…I had the privilege of being fired by Al Gore, since I refused to go along with his alarmism. Dr. William Happer, who began serving as the director of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy under the first President Bush in July of 1991
* I am a skeptic. … Global warming has become a new religion. Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize winner
* Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense. The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. Delgado Domingo’s, Environmental Scientist, Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group.
* There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth. Petition signed by 31,000 Scientists, including over 9,000 PhDs.
By Bruce


Bookmark: 








I am a climate change activist and playing my part to save the climate.
We’ve got to be united to save earth! Earth Hour is practiced at large scale in all developed and developing countries but there has been more publicity and awareness this year, as well as participation from large corporations like http://www.commit21.com/ which is a good sign – that there is still hope and that people still care!
Let’s all do this, no matter where you are! Saturday, 28 March 2009. Lights off from 8.30pm to 9.30pm!
— carefornature · Mar 17, 03:26 PM · #
Well said Bruce, its about time more people came forward with the truth.
— Brian · Mar 17, 04:14 PM · #
Hi Carefornature,
I love my planet, thus far I am unaware of a better one. It is always great to see someone try and make a positive effort to make things better.
The argument being put forward by scientists now is that resources and enthusiasm have been channelled down a dead end route. By combating Co2 increase with all of the worlds resources, we have ignored very real proven ecosystem destruction caused by mankind through deforestation and air and water pollution.
I advocate very strong environmental action, but on the aspects proven to be due to mankind. Co2 as a cause of climate change is far from proven, in fact it looks to be on its last legs when respected scientists are laughing at the model and stating it to be less worthy then using astrology to predict weather.
If we really care about the environment we need to save the natural ecosystems of our animal friends. Not worry about cows farting in New Zealand.
Best
Bruce
— Bruce · Mar 17, 09:23 PM · #
like it! very interesting and likely
— heidi · Mar 19, 07:04 PM · #
We are not ‘destroying’ the world. We are fighting, tooth and claw, for our place in it. Earthquakes, hurricane, floods, tsunamis, all show us the futility of endeavors meant to ‘constrain’ nature.
We fight a constant battle gainst insects, pests, bacteria, viruses, molds and an assortment of critters all scrabbling to be the first one to the food. Harming the planet? How about keeping the ants out of my kitchen…
Throw any Eco-activist up in Alaskan nature, and let them see how long nature respects their endeavors. The bears will be most greatful.
We can very easily make the earth uninhabitable for us.. but destroy it? I think thats far beyond our means. The world will not be destroyed, it will respond.
We’re riding on this planet in an elegance dance. The earth lead the dance for many eons. Now, we think we’re going to try to lead. And we’re going to lead a dance and we dont even know our partner?
Science represents not what is out there, but our current level of understanding. It exists whether we can explain it or not. We’re not done learning yet, and there’s lots left to teach.
How about we spend less time trying to predict whats going to happen, and run around with whatifs, and instead concentrate more on actually getting a good look at what we’ve got. We’ve still barely seen the bottom of the ocean, and Science is still discovering amazing things about, gasp Water itself! Heck, they didn’t even discover the undersea water current that extends from the south pole to the equator till just a few years ago.. Geeze.. x+y = Z.. wait.. there’s a w?
— Synchromancer · Mar 23, 02:12 PM · #
This is bullsh*t. Type in “africa solar power” into google. Look at the pictures AND read! This is an argument used by republicans mostly, and the gas, and car companies that don’t want to lose business. Research everything before u believe it! Be smart people! America needs smart people right now!
— Pochita · Apr 18, 01:53 AM · #
Hi Pochita,
I did Google as you suggested and my very point was echoed amongst the otherwise enthusiastic articles found:
“With all their advantages, solar systems are not cheap to install,” says Mr. Jem Porcaro, an analyst for the Energy and Environment Group at UNDP. “A typical home system in sub-Saharan Africa costs anywhere between $500 and $1,000 and such systems typically provide enough power to light three to six rooms and power a black-and-white TV each night. But the cost is well beyond the means of most African households.”
It is nice to think of Solar power as cheap and environmentally sound but first it has to be affordable to install. In the West we consider it to be prohibitively expensive and hardly bother with it. Why do we assume poor Africans can somehow get the money to install it?
It is an idealistic plan at this time. Until the world is willing to massively subsidise the technology it is a pie-in-the-sky idea to tell Africans to use solar generated electricity rather than fossil fuels or wood.
I am certainly not a republican, a casr dealer or an oil man. I am just an educated person who has eventually come to see there is no consensus on climate change as suggested by the IPCC. There is in fact an ongoing argument between thousands of informed scientists(fundamental to any scientific progression).
I fully agree with your parting words and would echo them here, “Research everything before you believe it!”
— Bruce · Apr 18, 01:21 PM · #
I respect whats been written in this article as with any other article written on the subject. I respect the planet and i do my best to keep it green. The fact of the matter is that there are so many ideas as to how the world will end. We have the mayan culture telling us that its going to end in 2012, we have scientists telling us aliens will take over, an ice age will come, the sun will turn into a red giant etc etc etc. There are endless claims as to how the world will end but why do so many focus on this? I dont see much point in dwelling on things that may inevitably happen. Instead i think it more important that people focus on appreciating what we have and not taking advantage of it (although humans being humans this is precisley what we do anyway…. At the end of the day, if the world is going to end tough bikkies, its gonna happen and theres very little we can do about it. Yes we can do our best to create a clean environment but if scientists are right in saying that alot of the world is beyond help, well there ya go. I think its important to think about the future in the sense of how can we make it better if given another chance as opposed to trying to prevent the inevitable. To be frank here, im only 19 and everything im saying is of personal opinion not of research or whatever. I just think that so many are going about it the wrong way. Before we get busy jumping to conclusions as to how the worlds going to end we ought to focus on how we can make it better if given another oppurtunity. And really people, there is no point in getting comepletely argumentative over this subject. Everyone will have a contradictory opinion and no ones going to agree with these opinions. Therefore it seems practical to do what you can now and hope for the oppurtunity to prevent it happening again. On a random note, world peace has gone out the window – now were trying to save the world instead. How bizarre.
Best wishes everyone!
— kiwizz · Oct 9, 12:25 AM · #
Hi Kiwizz,
Just to tackle some of your points:
“We have the mayan culture telling us that its going to end in 2012, we have scientists telling us aliens will take over, an ice age will come, the sun will turn into a red giant etc etc etc.”
The Maya do not tell us the world will end in 2012. I don’t know of any reputable scientist predicting an alien invasion or that in the near future the sun will become a red giant. I suggest you be careful of what you accept online.
I agree with you that focus on doomsday type things which leave no hope is pointless. We should chose to focus on the things we can change!
— Bruce · Oct 12, 11:40 AM · #
This article is spot-on. People in the US are slowly awaking. We need you to wake up americans, we europeans are already prepared for a revolution.
— Justaguy · Nov 4, 11:28 PM · #